The Company will be constrained by the potential need to finance
repurchases of Ordinary Shares in connection with a Business Combination
The Company may only proceed with a Business Combination if it can confirm that it has sufficient
financial resources to pay the cash consideration required for such Business Combination plus all amounts
due to the Dissenting Shareholders. Considering that a Business Combination only requires a majority of
at least 70% of the votes of the Shareholders cast at the BC-EGM, subject to the Business Combination
Quorum, a Business Combination could be approved with Dissenting Shareholders representing up to
30% of votes cast at the BC-EGM.
At the time the Company enters into an agreement for the Business Combination, it will not know how
many Dissenting Shareholders may exercise their rights to sell their Ordinary Shares to the Company.
Therefore the Company will need to structure the Business Combination transaction based on its
expectations as to the number of Ordinary Shares that will re-sold to the Company. If a larger than
expected number of Ordinary Shares is submitted for resell, the obligation to repurchase Ordinary Shares
from the Dissenting Shareholders may result in the Company not having sufficient funds to complete a
Business Combination or in the Company needing to restructure the Business Combination transaction.
Financing the repurchase of Ordinary Shares held by Dissenting Shareholders could constrain the amount
the Company is able to pay in acquiring the Target, increase its financing costs or require the Company
to seek Ordinary Shareholders’ concessions prior to proposing a potential Business Combination. Please
also see the Risk Factor: “The Company may need to arrange third-party financing and there can be no
assurance that it will be able to obtain such financing, which could compel the Company to restructure or
abandon a particular proposed Business Combination”.
The above considerations may limit the Company’s ability to complete the Business Combination in the
most favorable way, make it difficult to optimise its capital structure and may increase the
probability that the Business Combination will be unsuccessful. This may negatively impact the business,
development, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of the Company.
Resources may be used in researching potential Targets while such research
does not lead to the consummation of a Business Combination, which could
materially and adversely affect subsequent attempts to achieve a Business
Combination
The investigation of a specific Target and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements,
disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention
and substantial costs for accountants, external auditors, lawyers, consultants and other advisors. If the
Company decides not to complete a specific Business Combination, the costs incurred up to that point
for the proposed transaction would likely not be recoverable. Furthermore, if the Company reaches an
agreement relating to a specific Target, the Company may fail to complete the Business Combination
for any number of reasons including those beyond the Company’s control. These reasons include the
situation that more than 30% of the Ordinary Shareholders participating in the BC-EGM vote against
the proposed Business Combination. The voting threshold could be even higher than 70% depending on
the type of transaction or other resolutions that may need to be passed in order to effect the Business
Combination. For example, and only to the extent such rules would become or would be held applicable,
if a shareholder, or shareholders that are considered to be acting in concert, of the Target would acquire
more than 30% of the voting rights in the Company, the prior approval by a majority of at least 90%
of the votes cast at the BC-EGM would be required to approve the use of the mandatory bid exemption
under Dutch law for each of such shareholders. As such, if initially more than 10% of the shareholders
participating in the BC-EGM vote against the use of the mandatory bid exemption, the Company may
need to invest additional resources and will likely have to incur additional costs to obtain the required
approval in this respect.
Any such event will result in a loss to the Company of the related costs incurred which could materially
adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another Target, and as such
may negatively impact the business, development, financial condition, results of operations and prospects
of the Company.
The Company may need to arrange third-party financing and there can be no
assurance that it will be able to obtain such financing, which could compel